You have been deceived as many have by a logical fallacy. Since this fallacy (equivocation) is so often used by evolutionists, it is worth taking some time to research it so you can recognize it in a few weeks when it is used again. In this tactic the word "evolution" changes meaning from "natural selection" to "beneficial mutation that created new information". These items are clearly different issues, but they have been conflated by those attempting to use evidence for natural selection to prove the theory of evolution.

To get a better understanding of the difference of "Natural Selection" verse "Evolution", read this article:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/natural-selection-vs-evolution

Bacteria are used for these experiments because they produce generations quickly, but the basics of bacterial biology are not understood by many, especially DNA and how it is utilized by the cell. This makes it easy for a scientist to deceive people and say, "Look, this is evolution here". For more information about these bacteria experiments see:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v4/n1/beneficial-mutations-in-bacteria

No one will come to God or see Him when they come in the futile arrogance and pride of human wisdom alone.
When you come in humility, then I predict this verse will become true for you again:
Psalm 19

The Works and the Word of God.

For the choir director. A Psalm of David.

1The (A)heavens are telling of the glory of God;
And their (B)expanse is declaring the work of His hands.
2Day to (C)day pours forth speech,
And (D)night to night reveals knowledge.
3There is no speech, nor are there words;
Their voice is not heard.
4Their [a](E)line has gone out through all the earth,
And their utterances to the end of the world

You sound like an agnostic, not an atheist. It frustrates me that so few understand the difference.

Ah, but can you see the gray areas in the middle? A lot of the debate about religion centers on fundamentalist Christianity versus fundamentalist atheism, and doesn't allow for any combination in between. It's a false dichotomy to state that either the Bible is literally inerrant and true, or there is no God.

I suggest reading Finding Darwin's God by Kenneth R. Miller. Dr. Miller is not the most elegant of writers; in fact I found the book painfully clumsy to read at points. In essence he points to how religionists have it wrong. He points to how scientific atheism is wrong. They he puts forth alternate ideas that suggest that God, basically, created science. Where Einstein famously claims that "God does not play dice," Miller states that yes, that's exactly what God did with the universe. Remember, though, that he's the "house" and invented the games of chance, ensuring that the house would win.

Keep reading. Keep learning. The more I lean, the less I know, but the more exciting the possibilities.

Though I feel the templates and widgets are few, but the product is excellent and I hope new features soon.